Showing posts with label Single-sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Single-sex. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 October 2014

The Advantages of Single Sex Teaching from 11-16

My interview with Nicola Woolcock of The Times published on Monday 7th October 2014:


Boys ‘easier to control in single-sex classes’ 
Teachers can impose tougher discipline on boys who are in segregated classrooms, an independent school head teacher has said in defence of single-sex education. Many experts extol the benefits for girls, but Mark Steed, principal of Berkhamsted School, said that boys thrived in a single-sex environment because teachers could be more “black and white” about discipline.
His views contradict Sir Michael Wilshaw, the head of Ofsted, who said last week that children were best taught in mixed classes. Mr Steed runs a “diamond” school, with girls and boys taught together until 11, separated on different sites during adolescence, and brought together for sixth form. “Boys manage without girls because the key to their academic success is discipline; it’s that simple,” he said. “It’s much easier in an all-boys environment to say, ‘That’s where the line is’. Whereas girls don’t like black and white, boys just need it. “It’s easier to manage boys’ performance between 14 and 16 by just saying ‘That’s how it is, son. That’s where the line is. Don’t cross it’. The massive strides [made at the school] in boys’ performance has been down to strong discipline and clear expectations.”
Girls benefited because they go through puberty earlier than boys, Mr Steed said. “For girls in years 8 to 9 (aged 12 to 14), it’s a very difficult period to have boys on the scene as well. “The other thing about single-sex schools is you can keep them younger for longer. They can just be themselves and grow up at their own rate. They’re less giggly, more focused on their work and slightly more competitive because of it. “We have roughly the same A-level take-up for sciences between the sexes, although slightly more girls do combined science and more boys choose physics.”
Mr Steed also said that achieving a top grade at GCSE was easy if you just “followed the instructions”, adding: “Girls are very good at taking stuff in and reproducing it and GCSE in its current form commends itself to that. Girls are more likely to follow the instructions than boys, but that doesn’t work at A level.” He said that he expected girls to become more stressed with the introduction of linear GCSEs this term, which are examined after two years and have no coursework.
When reunited at A level, boys and girls learn from each other’s styles of working, he said, with boys having to adapt to a less “nannying” approach than they were used to.
The school takes children from 5 months to 18. It also runs a separate prep school and sponsors an academy.

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Diamond schools – combining single-sex and co-educational teaching

Article written for The Service Parents' Guide to Boarding on "Diamond Schools".
A ‘diamond’ structure combines both single-sex and co-educational teaching. Typically, boys and girls are taught together until the age of 11, separately from 11 to 16, before coming back together again in a joint sixth form. 
‘Diamond schools’ are often the product of the merger of a boys' and a girls' school, so it is usual that at KS3 and KS4 girls and boys can be taught separately on different sites. It is a common feature that boys and girls combine outside the classroom for academic trips and visits and in some co-curricular activities, such as choirs, orchestras and the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme. 

A unique feel 

Diamond schools combine some of the best aspects of single sex and co-educational teaching. Boys and girls are kept apart during the crucial years of puberty, allowing them to grow up without the pressures that come from being in daily contact with the opposite sex. At Berkhamsted we find that, despite being taught the same curriculum in many cases by the same teachers, our boys’ and girls’ schools have their own unique feel.
Like most single-sex girls schools, we produce a higher proportion of female scientists and our girls perform better than our boys at GCSE. However, because co-curricular activities are for boys and girls together, they are able to maintain an appropriate level of social contact that means it is possible to develop friendships with the opposite sex. So when they come together into the sixth form, there is sufficient maturity for them to cope with co-education without it being a distraction. The transition to the co-educational sixth form has a feeling of real progression – at Berkhamsted, boys and girls move out of blazers and uniform to wearing city suits. The move up from the boys' and girls' schools is an important step in the growing up process and the sixth form is a natural preparation for university and the world of work.

A ‘one-stop’ drop 

The ‘diamond’ structure has further benefits too. For example, ‘diamond schools’ are very convenient for parents as effectively they provide a ‘one-stop’ drop for the school run – children of both sexes from nursery to sixth form can be dropped off together, or, indeed, share in a common bussing system. 
The main advantage, however, is that ‘diamond schools’ are able to retain many of the positive characteristics of small schools – each part is often of a size that will allow each pupil to know everyone in the school – while benefiting from the infrastructure and economies of scale of a much larger school.

Sunday, 22 January 2012

Single Sex v. Co-Ed?

Berkhamsted is mentioned in a wide-ranging discussion:

Meanwhile, some schools get round the problem with policies of partial segregation.

"We operate what's called a 'diamond structure', whereby boys and girls are taught together from three to 11, then have separate lessons from 11 to 16, and come back together in the sixth form", says Mark Steed, head of Berkhamsted School, in Hertfordshire.

"So while our boys and girls get the academic advantages of single-sex education, they also get the social advantages of being in a mixed-sex environment. They're getting the best of both worlds."

'Co-ed education: A lesson in growing up together' Daily Telegraph Saturday 21/01/2010

Saturday, 19 June 2010

"More flexibility in the exams system": a double-edged sword?

The Coalition Government has committed itself "to create more flexibility in the exams system" [See The Coalition: our programme for government; 26 Schools]. I believe that any deregulation of the examination system should be used to drive up academic standards, rather than to create a vehicle for competition between examination boards.


Flexibility to stretch the brightest

In an effort to maintain academic standards at KS4, Independent Schools have migrated towards the International GCSEs [iGCSEs] over the past five years. That these schools have done this particularly in the core subjects of Maths, Science and English is evidence that these are the areas where the Labour Government's intervened most to dumb down the curriculum. The announcement that state school pupils will be able to sit is good news for both the Maintained and Independent Sectors.

The top State schools, especially the surviving State Grammars, have campaigned to be allowed to sit these more rigorous examinations, but were prevented from doing so by the previous Secretary of State, lest it highlight the deficiencies of the new GCSE specifications. Michael Gove, who is more open to acknowledging that Maintained sector schools can learn much from our world-class schools in the Independent Sector, has opened up the iGCSE to all.

It is good news, too, for Independent Schools. If we are to have a two-tier examination system of "more academic" iGCSEs and "less academic" GCSEs, it is well that that two-tier system transcends both the Independent and Maintained Sectors as it takes away any potential for discriminating against pupils from our sector, say, in University applications.


Flexibility to create new attractive products for the marketplace

Whilst some aspects of the deregulation of GCSEs are clearly welcome, but I am not sure that there should be a free-for-all. I am deeply concerned by the proposal from AQA that boys and girls could be able to sit different GCSEs.

The statement by Bill Alexander, AQA's director of curriculum and assessment, to the TES outlines the rationale:
“We could offer a route for boys that is very different to a route for girls. Girls tend to perform better with coursework while boys do better with end-of-year exams. So we are pursuing that in science to see if we could have an option in science where we might have a straightforward examination for boys but a possibility of having a coursework option for girls.”
But how his statement goes on is more revealing:
“We are looking to do something different where there is a need in the market.

“The current GCSE criteria don’t allow coursework, but if we have now got flexibility and freedom to develop alternative products then that is what we will want to use our expertise to produce.”

Here lies one of the key problems with the British examination system, namely that we have three Awarding Bodies who are in competition with each other. Exams have become "products" in the "market". Schools inevitably choose products that will improve their results. The way that our examination system is structured at present only serves to perpetuate the year-on-year grade inflation. I am not sure that we should be giving the Exam Boards greater flexibility to make exams any easier.

Saturday, 6 March 2010

"Diamond Schools"

The debate about single-sex versus co-education is never likely to be one that is finally resolved. Young people behave differently when in single-sex and mixed company and from this stems the different character and atmospheres that one finds in single-sex and co-educational schools. There are clear advantages of both approaches. On the one hand, single-sex teaching seems to provide greater focus and allow young people the freedom to grow up at their own rate. On the other, there is fundamentally something unnatural about segregating the sexes throughout the period of schooling, when school is meant to be a preparation for life. "Diamond schools" are an innovative solution to the conundrum and have a very positive contribution to make to this debate.

A “diamond” structure combines both single-sex and co-educational teaching. Typically, boys and girls are taught together until the age of 11, separately from 11-16, before coming back together again in a joint Sixth Form.

"Diamond schools" are often the product of the merger of a boys' and a girls' school, thus it is usual that at KS3 and KS4 girls and boys can be taught separately on different sites. It is a common feature that boys and girls combine outside the classroom in activities for academic trips and visits and in some co-curricular activities, such as choirs, orchestras and the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme. Thus boys and girls are able to maintain an appropriate level of social contact that means that it is possible to develop friendships with those of the opposite sex.

The diamond structure has further additional benefits too.
"Diamond schools" are very convenient for parents as effectively they provide a "one-stop" drop for the school run - children of both sexes from nursery to sixth form can be dropped off together, or, indeed, share in a common busing system.
The main advantage, however, is that "Diamond schools" are able to retain many of the positive characteristics of small schools - each part is often of a size that will allow each pupil to know everyone in the school; whilst enjoying the benefits of an infrastructure and economies of scale of a much larger school.

"Diamond schools" in the UK Independent sector include:

This blogpost was published as an article written for the GSA MyDaughter website

Friday, 9 January 2009

Schools and Parents

The Girls' School Association [GSA] today launched a new website aimed at parents of girls, MyDaughter.co.uk. What is remarkable and interesting about this site is that it is not just a showcase and marketing portal for Independent Girls' schools, but it sets out to help parents with parenting.

The site has a section on Raising Your Daughter, which tackles issues such as sexual relationships, drugs and alcohol, food and diet, self-esteem and bullying. The section on Educating Your Daughter also includes "Tips for Parents" for each of the key stages of a girl's education. [I have quoted the tips for parents of 11-16 girls at the end of this piece for your further interest.]

I believe that it is a very encouraging sign that schools are willing to step forward and offer advice to parents. Whereas society once looked to the church to give a moral lead, it now looks to schools. We see this in media all of the time: heads of top independent schools get more coverage than the members of synod by a factor of ten to one. Note the success of Vicky Tuck's column in the Daily Telegraph or Martin Stephen or Anthony Seldon's various pronouncements. Heads, houseparents and teachers, especially those working in boarding schools which are responsible for young people 24/7, have accumulated considerable knowledge, experience and expertise in bringing up young people.

Parents increasingly need support and schools are well placed to give this. Heads and teachers have a professional distance - "it is always easier when it is someone else's child". They routinely deal with situations detached from the emotional involvement that can cloud judgement. Schools don't have all the answers, but schools do have an idea of what is a normative experience and are likely to have more experience of the exceptional. Parents should always know the child better than the school and, at the end of the day, parents don't have to take the advice being offered.

Teenagers are very adept at playing parents off against each other: "Everyone else is going to the party", "Everyone else's parents are letting them sleep over" etc. Schools can provide the structures and networks whereby parents can communicate effectively, they can set up forums whereby parents can discuss parenting issues with each other and with the school.

The MyDaughter website brings together the collective wisdom and experience of an important part of the Independent Schools sector and is an outstanding resource for parents of girls - let us hope that the boys don't miss out too much in the meantime!



  • By now she should be doing her homework away from distractions, in a space of her own. She will probably tell you that playing music helps her concentrate – and it might be true! Continue to encourage her to discuss her work with you; give plenty of praise and ask loads of questions


  • Make sure you know her friends’ names, they are very important to her and to her happiness. Don’t offer opinions on them unless asked. She will learn about herself by sampling a range of friends, some of whom you may not be comfortable with. The most important thing is to keep your lines of communication open and if you try to direct or control her friendships she may start to shut you out.


  • Don’t try to be your daughter’s best friend. She should have lots of friends but she only has one mother. Aim to be the best mother you can be. This includes setting and holding boundaries. Children feel secure when they know there are limits. No matter how hard she pushes she won’t stop loving you just because you say “No”. In fact she will feel safer and better loved, however much she huffs and slams doors!

  • When she is choosing her GCSE subjects listen to her, get her to talk to her teachers, offer your opinion but remember that she is the one who will be studying these subjects, not you.


  • Form realistic expectations of her academic potential by talking to her teachers. Remember that academic success is only one way of succeeding. Many “successful” members of society did not shine at school. Resourcefulness, creativity and perseverance, for example, are key qualities that are not directly measured by our academic system.


  • The best way of protecting your daughter against the perils of eating disorders and substance abuse is to build her self esteem. Value her for who she is rather than what she does. Help her see that there are more important things than appearance, possessions and clothes. Give her values that will sustain her through difficult times.
  • Saturday, 20 December 2008

    Single-sex & Co-education II: The Wren Academy

    The Wren Academy in the London Borough of Barnet is pioneering an innovative approach that combines both single-sex and co-educational teaching in the same school. Here the core subjects such as English, Mathematics, the Sciences and of course PE are arranged in single-sex sets; whereas the rest of the curriculum is taught in co-educational classes.

    The Wren Academy opened in September 2008 and, at present, only has a Year 7 cohort, so this approach is in its infancy. It will be interesting to track the performance of the young people in the school over the coming years.

    Thursday, 18 December 2008

    "Diamond Schools"

    The debate about single-sex versus co-education is never likely to be one that is finally resolved. Young people behave differently when in single-sex and mixed company and from this stems the different character and atmospheres that one finds in single-sex and co-educational schools. There are clear advantages of both approaches. On the one hand, single-sex teaching seems to provide greater focus and allow young people the freedom to grow up at their own rate. On the other, there is fundamentally something unnatural about segregating the sexes throughout the period of schooling, when school is meant to be a preparation for life. "Diamond schools" are an innovative solution to the conundrum and have a very positive contribution to make to this debate.


    A “diamond” structure combines both single-sex and co-educational teaching. Typically, boys and girls are taught together until the age of 11, separately from 11-16, before coming back together again in a joint Sixth Form.
    "Diamond schools" are often the product of the merger of a boys' and a girls' school, thus it is usual that at KS3 and KS4 girls and boys can be taught separately on different sites. It is a common feature that boys and girls combine outside the classroom in activities for academic trips and visits and in some co-curricular activities, such as choirs, orchestras and the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme. Thus boys and girls are able to maintain an appropriate level of social contact that means that it is possible to develop friendships with those of the opposite sex.


    The diamond structure has further additional benefits too.
    "Diamond schools" are very convenient for parents as effectively they provide a "one-stop" drop for the school run - children of both sexes from nursery to sixth form can be dropped off together, or, indeed, share in a common busing system.
    The main advantage, however, is that "Diamond schools" are able to retain many of the positive characteristics of small schools - each part is often of a size that will allow each pupil to know everyone in the school; whilst enjoying the benefits of an infrastructure and economies of scale of a much larger school.

    "Diamond schools" in the UK Independent sector include:


    This blogpost was published as an article written for the GSA MyDaughter website